Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeskai Convoke | crovax90 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Jeskai Convoke | rezerdedog | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Jeskai Convoke | crovax90 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Orzhov Sacrifice | gamer811 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Jeskai Convoke | promilx | 4-1 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Affinity , Azorius Artifacts , Azorius Glyph , Azorius Synthesizer , Boros Convoke , Jeskai Convoke , Mono White Tokens , Orzhov Engines , Orzhov Lifegain , Orzhov Raise
Meta Performance Analysis
Nesting Bot ranks #13 out of approximately 320 cards in raw efficiency (top 4%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
White average: 57.8%
Performance compared to other White cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Nesting Bot is an exceptional card that should be considered a format staple.
Recommended number of copies: 4
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 47.50 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 70.9%. Nesting Bot has a win rate of 79.2%, making it 11.7% better than other 1-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chandra, Spark Hunter | Legendary Planeswalker — Chandra | 10 | 60.8% | 2 |
| Crystal Barricade | Artifact Creature — Wall | 12 | 57.9% | 1 |
| Urabrask's Forge | Artifact | 16 | 57.4% | 1 |
| Kutzil's Flanker | Creature — Cat Warrior | 7 | 56.0% | 1 |
| Enduring Innocence | Enchantment Creature — Sheep Glimmer | 24 | 55.8% | 7 |
| The Wandering Rescuer | Legendary Creature — Human Samurai Noble | 6 | 55.4% | 1 |
| Sanguine Evangelist | Creature — Vampire Cleric | 32 | 55.0% | 5 |
| Yotian Frontliner | Artifact Creature — Soldier | 16 | 53.0% | 3 |
| Mockingbird | Creature — Bird Bard | 5 | 52.8% | 0 |
| Tectonic Hazard | Sorcery | 5 | 52.5% | 1 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Nesting Bot than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spell Pierce | Instant | 1 | 6 | 81.1% | 75.6% | +5.4% |
| Destroy Evil | Instant | 2 | 8 | 79.5% | 74.4% | +5.1% |
| Rest in Peace | Enchantment | 2 | 8 | 77.1% | 74.0% | +3.2% |
| Regal Bunnicorn | Creature — Rabbit Unicorn | 2 | 6 | 80.0% | 78.0% | +2.0% |
| Torch the Tower | Instant | 1 | 9 | 76.7% | 75.3% | +1.5% |
| Spyglass Siren | Creature — Siren Pirate | 1 | 7 | 76.7% | 75.4% | +1.3% |
| Sheltered by Ghosts | Enchantment — Aura | 2 | 7 | 75.9% | 74.7% | +1.1% |
| Novice Inspector | Creature — Human Detective | 1 | 9 | 76.7% | 76.8% | -0.1% |
| Wilt-Leaf Liege | Creature — Elf Knight | 4 | 6 | 74.2% | 74.3% | -0.1% |
| Warden of the Inner Sky | Creature — Human Soldier | 1 | 9 | 76.7% | 77.4% | -0.6% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeskai Convoke | 88 | 15.9% | 49.5% |
| Boros Convoke | 45 | 80.4% | 42.9% |
| Orzhov Sacrifice | 12 | 50.0% | 39.3% |
| Unknown Archetype | 7 | 2.2% | 24.3% |
| Azorius Affinity | 2 | 66.7% | 25.0% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.